Office of Research & Reporting
Collects and analyzes data and disseminates information designed to assist the North Central Texas College community in making informed decisions and facilitate improved institutional performance and accountability.
> RESEARCH & REPORTING
Goals: The Research & Reporting Office
gathers, synthesizes, summarizes and disseminates College information to meet internal and external information needs.
conducts research to address management questions and support assessment efforts at the institutional and (in some cases) departmental levels.
proactively conducts specialized research that may inform policy discussions.
provides service, professional expertise, and consultation to College and external colleagues.
designs, administers, and coordinates College surveys.
collects and prepares peer data for benchmarking and comparative studies.
designs queries and gathers, troubleshoots, organizes, documents, and maintains a robust data infrastructure to support Institutional Research work.
Facilitates skill development for the College community in use of data tools, programming, statistics, communication, data interpretation, and best business practices in the fields of Institutional Research and Higher Education.
Statement of Ethics
In accordance with the ethical practice of institutional research, office staff members agree to:
operate with integrity by conducting research that is objective and uses accepted technical standards.
employ secure data collection and storage practices that ensure confidentiality and protects the privacy of research subjects.
disseminate accurate information in a responsible manner.
The Reporting Role
This document attempts to outline the areas and extent of the Research and Reporting Office’s involvement in responding to internal and external requests for information about North Central Texas College. The "General Principles" presented here are followed by very important "Exceptions," and examples are provided to help clarify. It is our hope that these guidelines will be a starting point for discussions about the best way of accomplishing the goal of providing appropriate and meaningful information that is accurate to those who need it.
While reporting is often done through the Research and Reporting Office, it should be remembered that this office is first and foremost a research office. The office seldom "owns" the data that it uses. While all data on campus is theoretically open to this office, the Research and Reporting staff must take special care to use it correctly and wisely. There will necessarily be frequent consultations with the data owners. Therefore, the Research and Reporting staff must depend on the expertise, guidance, cooperation, and good will of the owners of the data in each area.
Handling Data
External Requests
Non-Routine External Requests for Study Participation
Internal Requests
Conclusions
These guidelines are meant to clarify the role of the Research and Reporting office in reporting College information. These guidelines may continue to evolve over time. However, they should serve as a good starting point. We are fortunate to work in an institution that highly values collegiality. Guidelines such as this are not meant to replace or even reduce the valuable discussion that takes place here, but to help us all to make sure that we are handling requests for information as effectively as possible.
Examples of Information Requests and Recommended Action
-
Request: An editor at the Denton Record Chronicle calls to ask for our current enrollments.
Recommended Action: The call should be directed to the Marketing and Public Relations Office. They should refer to Fact Book or contact Research and Reporting for "official" enrollment figures.
Reason: This is an external request for data from the news media, so the Marketing and Public Relations Office should handle it. Since the figure will be made public, it should be based on our official data, which Research and Reporting is responsible for providing.
-
Request: A department chair would like to know about the enrollments in a particular introductory course in her department over the past decade, in order to plan for the next few years.
Recommended Action: The Registrar Staff or the Research Staff can provide this.
Reason: This is an internal request for simple summary data (no analysis or tying to other institutional data). There is no obvious need for it to be based on public/official data, and it will likely not be used for other purposes.
-
Request: The US Department of Education requests the reporting of crime statistics.
Recommended Action: The survey should go to the Office of Emergency Management, who should confer with the Research and Reporting office for any enrollment, staff counts, etc. that may be requested. A copy of the completed survey should be sent to Research and Reporting.
Reason: This is an office-to-agency report that requests data for which the Research and Reporting office has no access or expertise. A copy should go to Research and Reporting since these data are publicly available and it's easy to conceive of it being used in ways other than intended by the collecting agency. (For example, a college ranking publication may decide to add crime rate to the factors considered.)
-
Request: Someone from another college calls to see if our applications for admission are up or down as of a certain point in time.
Recommended Action: The Admissions Office should handle this.
Reason: This is an informal request for unofficial data from a peer. Since data at a point midway through the admissions cycle are not yet official, the Admissions Office is also in the best position to decide whether the information is too sensitive to release.
Major Objectives
Accreditation
The Office of Research and Reporting provides support for the College's accreditation review processes.
-
Accreditation is a process by which U.S. institutions of higher education undergo a peer review to assess and certify educational excellence. It is also a status held by institutions that meet a rigorous set of common quality standards established by an accrediting body.
-
North Central Texas College is accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Commission on Colleges (SACSCOC) to award associate degrees and certificates of completion. Questions about the accreditation of North Central Texas College may be directed in writing to the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Commission on Colleges at 1866 Southern Lane, Decatur, GA 30033-4097, by calling (404) 679-4500, or by using information available on SACSCOC’s website.
The Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Commission on Colleges is the regional body for the accreditation of degree-granting higher education institutions in the Southern states. It serves as the common denominator of shared values and practices among the diverse institutions in Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia and Latin America and other international sites approved by the Commission on Colleges that award associate, baccalaureate, master's, or doctoral degrees. The Commission also accepts applications from other international institutions of higher education. The mission of the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Commission on Colleges is to assure the educational quality and improve the effectiveness of its member institutions. The Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Commission on Colleges has six core values: integrity; continuous quality improvement; peer review and self-regulation; accountability; student learning; and transparency. -
The College is currently preparing for its 2021 regional reaffirmation, including a Self-Study and a visit from external evaluators.
Resources & Helpful Links
FAQs
-
There are several reasons for tracking the identity of your respondents. First, you may wish to track who responded so that you can send reminders and follow-ups only to those who have not yet responded. This is an admirable goal, but you should weigh the burden of an unnecessary contact with respondents against the discomfort they may feel at your having an identifier.
You might track respondents if you have additional individual information about them that you'd like to be able to link with their survey responses. For example, College wide surveys sometimes track respondents so that we can learn how opinions may relate to institutional data such as respondents' participation in majors or minors.Another reason to track respondents is if you have offered an incentive for responding that you will need to award. In this case, however, you may be able to find a way to have their response status tracked without actually linking their identity to their survey.
In any of these situations you should be clear in the survey invitation whether and how tracking will be used.
-
You can find experts arguing on both sides of this question. The neutral point allows the respondent to... well, to be neutral. It is the 2 in a 3-point scale, or the 3 in a 5-point scale. It is the choice to neither agree nor disagree, or to be neither satisfied nor dissatisfied. A scale that does not provide a neutral point essentially forces the respondent to give an opinion. Some audiences don't respond well to being forced, and some issues may be complex enough that a neutral option is warranted. Again you should balance the value of having a clear opinion against the accuracy of your data and comfort of your respondents.
-
When it is possible for a question to not be applicable to everyone. It is useful to know whether people didn't respond to a question because they skipped it (who knows why) or because it didn't apply to them. You're not learning an opinion, but you are learning some important information. Just be sure to handle those responses properly in the analysis stage.
-
You should consider the layout of your questions in deciding the direction. If the response options are laid out left to right, it may make intuitive sense to put the positive options toward the right, like this:
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Agree
Strongly Agree
But if the response options go from top to bottom, you may wish for the respondents to see the positive options first, like this:
Very Satisfied
Somewhat Satisfied
Somewhat Dissatisfied
Very Dissatisfied
What is really more important is that whichever way your scales go, they all go the same way, so that your respondents don't miss a change of direction, or get confused.